|
HAPPINESS
IS FREEDOM
Cartoon from the review: "Effe", 1974
ABSTRACT:
In replying to accusations that as a man he wants to exploit the battle
for abortion, Marco Pannella declares that these "feminists"
are an aristocracy completely cut off from the feelings of the millions
of women committed to the civil rights struggle.
Amica - Precisely what do you mean when you speak of "personal politics"? Pannella - I say freedom and happiness not to indicate two similar things, but one and the same thing. I have always said that everything connected with the life of the conscience, with the daily problems of each of us, have precedence over all the others, have political precedence. This is the reason why we speak of love, of sexuality, of masturbation, divorce, abortion, as strictly political aspects of the individual. A - Some feminists refuse to form alliances with men (or political parties) in the battle for abortion, because they say that once it is legalised abortion will only be one more "convenience" for men, whereas, on the contrary, it ought to put into question their aggressive and violent way of making love. What do you think of that? P - This
kind of feminists only number one hundred fifty at most. But it is not
the quantity as much as the fact that if we, ten of us, speak of "divorce"
or "abortion", we are the spokesmen of thirty four million people
with a parliament that represents, more or less, 35% of them. These feminists
are an aristocracy, and oligarchy, because their voice finds no echo,
does not express the degree or quality of the maturity and conscience
of the so-called common people, because I maintain that the common people
are not mature. Women, on the other hand, are very mature, inasmuch as
they have abortions. The act of aborting must certainly be considered
among the most moral acts in this world. A - And the feminists of the MLD (2) (federated with the Radical Party), how do they find themselves mirrored in the policies of the Radical Party? P - There
is a macroscopic datum: when in 1965 we formed the league for divorce,
after four months 70% of our militants were women. And this is no accident.
Then there is our "Reichian" attitude on sexual liberation,
our anti-clerical stance and thus our policy on chastity, innocence, virginity
as oppression of women, all of which we articulated in 1962. Then there
is non-violence, our criticism of the traditional male role, of violence
in the name of strength, our criticism of the culture of aggression, of
the hierarchy as an element of efficiency. We have turned all this upside
down. We have always said that being disorderly is the maximum of efficiency
because it blocks the formation of hierarchical roles, even in the family,
among couples, in the love relationship. P - That
article is the most anti-feminist I have ever read. Because, in effect,
it is not against me but against the silly little woman, unaware, who
needs Gary Cooper, the myth, the hero, and finds him in the political
sphere (who according to the feminists would be me). Hence the disdain
for this "poor creature" and for all the minorities. It is anti-popular
revolution against women as they are, against the workers as they are.
She, this "superior" feminist, considers herself an independent
woman and judges the others to be inept, poor little things. It is the
queen bee looking down on the workers who are my comrades of the MLD taking
their fight into the streets, the squares, the slums. They have been the
worker bees for seven years. The aristocratic feminists are the Jacobins
who, as in the french Revolution, are part of the most rigid club, not
against the aristocrats who are on the outside, but against Marat, Danton,
and then Robespierre... TRANSLATOR'S NOTES 1) "Amica" - A popular women's magaizine. 2) MLI - Movimento per la Liberazione della Donna or Women's Liberation Movement. |