Peace Walk: Mediators Tiptoe Across Minefield Separating Armenia and Azerbaijan

John Ward Anderson Washington Post Service
The International Herald Tribune

EAST OF FIZULI, Azerbaijan Generally speaking, walking through a minefield is not the preferred way to get from Point A to Point B.

But for a delegation of U.S., Russian and French peace negotiators trying to end 13 years of conflict between Azerbaijan and Armenia, the four-kilometer (two-and-a-half-mile) march through a heavily mined no-man's-land separating the two combatants was more than just an exercise in getting to the other side.

"If there are new hostilities, this is the most likely place where fighting will break out," said Carey Cavanaugh, a troubleshooting U.S. ambassador with a flair who is a co-chairman of the three-nation mediating group. "We are very concerned," he added, "about recent saber-rattling. We think it's irresponsible. We see no way further hostilities will advance peace in this region, and we deliberately crossed here to shine the international spotlight on that."

The conflict between the former Soviet republics of Azerbaijan and Armenia revolves around control of Nagorno-Karabakh, a remote mountainous enclave inside Azerbaijan that is populated principally by ethnic Armenians who want to become either independent or a part of Armenia.

The mediation effort has made significant headway since the beginning of this year in brokering a final peace - details of which are closely guarded. The presidents of the two countries have agreed to about 80 percent of an armistice - including one of the most politically sensitive issues, the final status of Nagorno-Karabakh - but several contentious issues remain, negotiators said. The effort has been complicated by recent calls in Azerbaijan to consider renewed military action.

"Nobody wants to resume military action," Nikolai Gribkov, the Russian co-chairman of the mediating group, told a group of Azerbaijani lawmakers in the capital, Baku. "It's easy to start a war, but it's very difficult to stop it. We've had a war in Chechnya for six years, and there's no way we want you to suffer that."

The fighting, which has killed about 30,000 people, peaked following the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, when Armenian troops seized Nagorno-Karabakh and hundreds of square kilometers of Azerbaijani territory surrounding it. Russia helped negotiate a cease-fire in 1994, but about 100 people a year are still killed by snipers and land mines near the line of control.

The mediation effort has a highly unusual level of personal involvement by the presidents of the United States, France and Russia, each of whom has met with his Armenian and Azerbaijani counterparts in recent months to prod the effort ahead and urge a spirit of compromise. President George W. Bush met separately with the leaders - Robert Kocharian of Armenia and Heydar Aliyev of Azerbaijan - in Washington in April after a four-day, U.S.-sponsored round of negotiations in Key West, Florida.

The minefield crossing last week was part of the effort to keep the two leaders from backtracking on the progress they made in Florida in the face of strong opposition to compromise by their intensely proud and nationalistic citizens.

White flak jacket around his torso, freshly painted green helmet atop his head and garment bag slung over his shoulder, Mr. Cavanaugh stepped gingerly along the path, pointing to spots where mines had been excavated earlier that day for the passage. "We're the first foreigners in this area since the fighting stopped" about eight years ago, he said. "Nobody's crossed here in years. They'll re-mine as soon as we're across."

By insisting on walking across the line of control, the 14-member negotiating team had to cross a wide swath of Azerbaijan that is occupied by Armenia. What the group saw was complete destruction: kilometer after kilometer of razed villages, destroyed farms and factories, and overgrown fields and vineyards speckled with broken grain silos and rusted water tanks.

Artillery barrages caused much of the ruin in the early 1990s, and other damage came from refugees who stripped the land of anything useful. The country will have to be almost completely rebuilt, at a cost of hundreds of millions of dollars.

There were occasional signs that Armenian civilians were farming the region, which is supposed to be occupied only by soldiers. Settlements in the occupied territory could complicate negotiations and the eventual return of about 750,000 Azerbaijanis who fled the area almost a decade ago and now live in refugee camps scattered around Azerbaijan.

The conflict has been elevated on the international agenda for several reasons. The United States and France have large and politically powerful Armenian lobbies pushing for a resolution. Azerbaijan and Armenia are sandwiched between Russia, Turkey and Iran, and any renewed hostilities could draw in those powers on opposing sides, with Russia supporting Armenia and Azerbaijan backed by Iran and Turkey, a NATO country.

Both countries receive massive amounts of international aid because their economies have been strangled by war-related blockades and sanctions that probably will be lifted only after a final peace is sealed. They lie just west of oil-rich Central Asia and the Caspian Sea, and many plans for pipelines to the west call for oil and gas to be transported across or near their borders. Also, political analysts say that Mr. Aliyev, the Azerbaijani leader, who is 78 and in failing health, is eager to settle the conflict to increase the chances for his son, Ilham, to succeed him.

SOME OF THOSE issues are what originally prompted more intense, face-to-face negotiations between Mr. Kocharian and Mr. Aliyev, who have met 16 times since the spring of 1999 to try to bridge their differences. During those talks, according to a diplomat familiar with their meetings, they developed enough of a rapport to flesh out what kinds of things might be possible, and at the Key West sessions, ideas and issues were committed to paper.

Vardan Oskanian, Armenia's foreign minister, said time was running out, because both Armenia and Azerbaijan have presidential elections scheduled for the spring of 2002, and "early January of next year will be election time already. Everything will be so political it will be impossible" to finalize a peace plan.

Negotiators met with both presidents last week to help refine some proposals and to encourage them to prepare their people for compromise. The negotiators refused to say what had been agreed to so far.

Azerbaijanis are adamant that Nagorno-Karabakh, which during Soviet times was about 75 percent Armenian, remain part of their country but said it would be granted full autonomy. People in Nagorno-Karabakh and Armenia say the region is part of Azerbaijan only because of a decree issued in the 1920s by Stalin. They demand that Nagorno-Karabakh have equal status with Azerbaijan and not be under the Azerbaijani government.

"Karabakh will never be part of Azerbaijan," declared Colonel Avsharyan Eduard Mkhitar, who commands a tank unit of the armed forces of Karabakh. "Karabakh can and must be united with Armenia."

Other apparently unresolved issues include the status of Shusha, a mountain town overlooking Stepanakert, Nagorno-Karabakh's capital, which Christian Armenians and Muslim Azerbaijanis both claim as a religious and cultural center. And it seems likely that there will have to be some sort of corridor exchange: Armenians want free passage between their country and Nagorno-Karabakh - preserving the existing Lachin corridor - and Azerbaijanis want free passage from the main part of their country to Nakhichevan, a small province in the west, near Turkey, that is completely separated from Azerbaijan by a 32-kilometer-wide stretch of Armenia. It, too, is a Stalin-era peculiarity.

"The issues that remain are vexing - surmountable, but hard," said Mr. Cavanaugh, the U.S. negotiator. "Almost every problem in the Middle East is replicated here: disputes over a holy historic and cultural center, illegal settlers in occupied areas, questions about status and sovereignty and the return of refugees."

The Middle East is also instructive, he said, because public negotiations have enabled critics to attack proposals they don't like before an entire peace package can be assembled, which rips the effort apart before it can be completed.

"It's easy to attack a compromise if you can't say, 'This is what you get for it,'" Mr. Cavanaugh said. "I think President Aliyev and President Kocharian want to frame a package so they can say to their people, 'If you can accept these details, you get peace now.'"