Parliamentary question by Marco Pannella (NI) to the Commission and answer given by Mr Patten on behalf of the Commission
WRITTEN QUESTION P-2481/01
by Marco Pannella (TDI) to the Commission
(5 September 2001)
Subject: Dr Yunis Shaikh sentenced to death in Pakistan
On 18 August 2001 Dr Yunis Shaikh was imprisoned in Adiala jail and sentenced to death for blasphemy by a Pakistani court. He is convicted of blasphemy for expressing the view that Mohammed and his family could not have been Muslims before the Prophet was inspired and other similar opinions, deemed offensive by the Pakistani clergy.
The trial was attended by a screaming crowd, whose feelings were whipped up by members of the clergy, while witnesses were called to court despite having stated that they had not been present when Dr Shaikh had made the alleged statements. He was given only one week to appeal to the Supreme Court instead of the usual thirty days. Even if nobody has hitherto been hanged for blasphemy in Pakistan, hundreds of people, charged with or convicted of blasphemy languish in prisons, inside the "death cells", where they can barely stand up.
Did the Commission follow Dr Yunis Shaikh's trial through the presence of its own representative? Has the Commission reacted officially to the death sentence passed on Dr Yunis Shaikh? Which initiatives has it taken or does it intend to take vis-à-vis the increase in convictions for blasphemy in Pakistan and, more generally, violations of fundamental human rights?
Answer given by Mr Patten
on behalf of the Commission
(2 October 2001)
The Commission is very concerned about the application of the blasphemy law in Pakistan. Blasphemy related to the Prophet Mohammed is subject to the death penalty, whereas blasphemy of the Koran is punishable by life imprisonment. To date a disproportionate number of cases have been brought up against religious minorities and the press.
The Commission is fully aware of the lawsuit against Dr. Yunis Shaikh, a Muslim, as raised by the Honourable Member. Dr. Shaikh was sentenced to death on blasphemy charges on 18 August 2001 and has since appealed the judgement, a lengthy process in Pakistan which can last years. Whereas todate, verdicts in blasphemy cases were revoked by higher benches, on 24 July 2001 a potentially dangerous precedent was set when in the case of Ayub Masih the appeal court upheld an earlier judgement.
On the occasion of a human rights conference organised by the Government of Pakistan in April 2000, a procedural reform of the blasphemy law was announced. However, following strong protests from religious groups the government withdrew the proposal.
The Commission is actively participating in joint Union efforts to address human rights issues in Pakistan as part of the Common Foreign and Security Policy. The blasphemy law was raised with the authorities during ad hoc political Troika talks in Islamabad on 20-21 November 2000. On 3 May 2001 the Troika carried out a demarche on the death penalty with the Minister of Law and Justice, Human Rights and Parliamentary Affairs. On this, as well as other occasions since then, the Union's concerns on the blasphemy law have been communicated to the Pakistan authorities.
Iscritti e contribuenti 2015
|PIERLUIGI G. Acuto||590 €|
|LUIGI D. Roma||590 €|
|GIAMPIERO T. Roma||590 €|
|PAOLA C. Roma||200 €|
|FILOMENA G. Roma||590 €|
|MARIO C. Montevarchi||590 €|
|PAOLO M. Roma||200 €|
|CLAUDIO P. Zugliano||100 €|
|GAETANO S. Roma||200 €|
|VALENTINA T. Collebeato||600 €|
|Total SUM||353.319 €|
Archivio storico foto
Manifestazione davanti al Senato (Corsia Agonale di piazza Navona), al termine di un digiuno pubblico di 24 giorni, per chiedere che sia fissato il termine di discussione della legge sul divorzio. Nella foto: Marco Pannella parla con Liliana Ingargiola, e con un gruppo di altre donne. Fra i cartelli: "Chiediamo niente 'crisi' e emendamenti dilatori. Divorzio il 9 ottobre". "Dite sì al divorzio. Una firma contro il Concordato".
Dello stesso autore
Presentation in Geneva of the written proceedings of the Conference “Rule of law v. Reason of State”
- 1 of 2
06/26/2008 Civil Rights QUESTIONS (EP) EP, Write question, Detention-without-charge in the UK
10/01/2007 Chechnya QUESTIONS (EP) OSCE's Exclusion of Nongovernmental Organizations, a Violation of the Helsinki Principles
07/01/2005 QUESTIONS (EP) Vietnam Human rights violations against the Montagnard people of the Vietnam Highlands
03/01/2005 Egypt QUESTIONS (EP) Ayman Nur: Reply to the written question of Emma Bonino by Benita Ferrero-Waldner on behalf of the EC